Ontology Ai research consultant

WOW DODGED A BULLET ON THAT!

Had an offer out there but a followup conversation brings me back to starting over.  I will be posting a new job but in the meantime I am looking for someone that can think outside the box and has the smarts to know the difference. Honestly, I find smarter people at a McDonalds then most of the PhD candidates that have applied!

Trying to fix it but damn the dogma is thick around here.

If you too think that most of philosophy is populated by third string intellects as I do then take a chance and apply.

Consider it an IQ test, pass/fail and I am the grader.

The last failed canidate was asked to listen yet all they did was preach, how so very sad for this art I love that it would be populated by idiots!

That said, we anticipate bringing more minds into the fold soon. If you're interested in this project, we still welcome your résumé and a clear expression of interest.

One thing you should know: I call Aristotle Master. Full stop. Aristotle—period.

So please, no Platonists. No Existentialists, Idealists, or Determinists. And by all that still holds meaning, no Analytical or Continental philosophers—or anyone who thinks they know.

:) Cheers

Position: Research Collaborator – Ontological AI & Aristotelian Philosophy (Paid Trial, Growth Opportunity)

I am seeking an intelligent, curious, and rigorous graduate student or early-career thinker with a genuine interest in philosophy—especially Aristotelian ontology—and its modern applications in AI, ethics, and human cognition.

Over the past 16 years, I have developed an extensive body of work that revives and evolves ancient philosophical principles, applying them to modern challenges in artificial intelligence and knowledge systems. This is not academic theory for theory’s sake—it is designed for practical, profitable use.

Your role will be to engage with, test, and help refine these models as we prepare them for market. You will be working directly with me to advance a first-principled AI structure, grounded in ontological clarity and dimensional reasoning, rather than statistical mimicry or data-fitting shortcuts.

Who This Is For:
A philosophy grad student or independent thinker (the last candidate failed this miserably) with a strong foundation in Aristotelian thought (another failure of that candidate, good fake at first though).

Someone who still sees philosophy as a tool for understanding reality, not just for academic discussion (All who have applied have failed this requirement).

An individual curious to apply ancient truths to the modern problems of AI and digital cognition (tried this but hit a brick wall with every candidate..arrggghh!)

Critical thinkers welcome here, (most candidates mistake a patronizing attitude for critical thinking, another failure of a philosophic education). Original thought is essential (give me a break I have interviewed scores of PhDs and have not found one of orginal thought, only parrots reciting their lessons).

What We’re Building:
A profit-making enterprise rooted in serious philosophical rigor (not avilable to idiots).

A model that corrects the fractures in current AI systems by reintroducing structural coherence and ontological discipline (Forget it, I have all but thrown in the towell to think I can find someone to comprehhend this, here the idiot is me!)

A commercial vision where philosophers are rewarded accordingly. If this succeeds and you’re not earning $100K within a year, I will have failed. Failure is not an option.  This is the low range, but again, not available to idiots).

Terms:
3-month paid trial (don't even have to budget, as the odds of finding someone with a clue is remote, I just like excercises in futility).

After that, we part ways or formalize a serious, lucrative arrangement (Or,we part ways when I realize going into philosophy is often the course of avoding studying psychology to cure their onw idiocy, doesn't work).

Remote collaboration possible. Sharpness and clarity are essential (not holding my breath).

If you believe philosophy was meant for more than academic journals—and you’re ready to help forge that path—let’s talk (Actually don't even F@#king bother!, I got this as you would only serve to slow me doown as the previous candudate did!)

DO NOT APPLY - THIS IS HERE TO EXPRESS MY SINCERE FRUSTRATION WITH THE STATE OF PHILOSOPHY.  IF YOU DOUBT ME JUST SAY "PHILOSOPHY" TO ANYONE ON THE STREE!

THAT, IS THE RESULT OF THE ART YOU ARE IN!  JUST DO NOT BOTHER APPPLYING, I WILL JUST RECRUIT FROM ANOTHER DISCIPLINE THAT HAS A HIGHER PROBABILTY OF SMART, LIKE KENESIOLOGY OR BASKET WEAVING!

Steven Easley
Ontological Architect